Why teams switch
Less billing reconstruction
ClockoutClockout vs TrackingTime
TrackingTime is project-based time tracking software with task management, team collaboration, and reporting. It positions as a Toggl-alternative with deeper project planning features. Clockout is the better choice when project planning isn't your bottleneck — when the friction is in invoicing the projects after they're done, not in scoping or tracking them.
Why teams switch
Less billing reconstruction
What stays attached
Client, project, task, and notes
Pricing entry point
Clockout Pro starts at $4/month
TrackingTime bundles project management with tracking — Clockout is invoicing-focused
$4 flat all-in vs TrackingTime's $5/user Pro or $10/user Business
Cadenced reminders + payment status are first-class in Clockout
If you don't need project planning in your time tracker, you're paying for unused features
The honest tradeoff
TrackingTime occupies the middle ground between pure timers (Toggl) and full project management (Asana, ClickUp). For small teams that don't have a PM tool and don't want to maintain one, the bundle is genuinely useful at a reasonable price.
The trade-off is the billing workflow downstream of tracking. TrackingTime's invoicing layer is functional but shallow — basic templates, basic reminders, no payment-status workflow. Clockout flips the priority: skip the PM bundle, focus on the billing path. The right choice depends on whether your weekly bottleneck sits in project planning or in invoicing.
Decision criteria
PM bundle vs. focused billing. TrackingTime bundles PM + tracking. Clockout is tracking + billing. Pick by which side carries weight.
Per-user pricing math. TrackingTime scales linearly per user; Clockout's flat-plus-seat model is flatter at typical team sizes.
Team collaboration need. If your team needs to coordinate on projects inside the time tracker, TrackingTime fits. If team coordination happens elsewhere, Clockout is enough.
Who this is for
When buyers compare Clockout vs TrackingTime side-by-side, these are the criteria that usually decide it.
you don't need PM features bundled with tracking
cadenced reminders matter to your cash flow
per-user pricing doesn't fit your team
project planning + tracking in one tool matters
team collaboration on projects is essential
you bill mostly flat-fee projects
Decision table
These rows focus on buying criteria that change the day-to-day billing experience, not just plan matrices.
Pick TrackingTime if...
There are real cases where TrackingTime is the better fit than Clockout. Being honest about them helps you decide faster.
01
TrackingTime's project management features (tasks, milestones, team collaboration) are a real differentiator if you don't have a separate PM tool.
02
TrackingTime supports team task assignment, comments, and shared project visibility. For small-team coordination, that integrated workflow has value.
03
TrackingTime's project-fee structure fits well when invoices come from project completion, not from tracked hours per task.
Pick Clockout if...
If you have a PM tool already (or don't need one), TrackingTime's project layer is wasted features. Clockout is focused on tracking + invoicing.
Clockout's per-client multi-touchpoint reminder sequences are deeper than TrackingTime's basic reminder approach.
TrackingTime Pro × 5 users = $25/month. Clockout for 5 = $12/month. The math gets worse at Business tier.
How to run the A/B test
If you don't actively use TrackingTime's PM features, you're funding them for nothing.
Time tracking → invoice draft → cadenced reminders → paid. The whole loop without PM features.
TrackingTime Pro × users × 12 vs Clockout $4 + $2/seat × 12. Real annual delta at any team size.
Project-side friction = TrackingTime. Billing-side friction = Clockout.
Pricing snapshot
Treat this as a buying shortcut. Always confirm the live pricing page before a final decision.
Reviewed April 11, 2026
TrackingTime pricing posture
Free tier, Pro $5/user/month, Business $10/user/month.
Clockout pricing posture
$4 flat for the owner. $2 per additional seat.
Per-user pricing on TrackingTime scales with team; Clockout's flat-plus-seat is flatter at typical team sizes.
How to switch
The lowest-risk test is to compare one live billing cycle side by side.
If you don't actively use TrackingTime's PM features, you're funding them for nothing.
Time tracking → invoice draft → cadenced reminders → paid. Without PM features.
TrackingTime Pro × users × 12 vs Clockout's flat model.
FAQ
Light. Clockout supports projects per client and tasks within projects, but doesn't include task assignment, milestones, comments, or team collaboration features. If those are important, TrackingTime or a dedicated PM tool fits better.
Yes via CSV. TrackingTime's time entry export imports into Clockout with clients, projects, and durations. Project tasks and team comments don't carry over (Clockout doesn't have those concepts).
5-person team on TrackingTime Pro ($5/user × 12) = $300/year. Same team on Clockout ($12/month × 12) = $144/year. ~$156/year saved.
If billing still feels pieced together
If you are comparing tools because billing still feels messier than it should, the best test is a real client week in Clockout.
Try the same sequence in a real workspace: track the work, review the week, and send the invoice from the same record instead of rebuilding the bill later.